Florida Woman Says Former Church Plans to Make Her Sins Public

From Fox News:

A 49-year-old Florida woman says her former church is threatening to reveal her sins to its congregation after learning that she is in a “sexually immoral relationship.”

Rebecca Hancock told FOXNews.com that Grace Community Church, a non-denominational church in Jacksonville, Fla., was against her relationship with boyfriend Frank Young because the two were sexually active but not married.

When she wasn’t willing to obey the church’s orders to leave him, she decided to leave the church instead, allowing her two children to remain active members.

Now, she says, church elders have given her the worst ultimatum yet: In a Dec. 8 letter, they told her she either has to meet with them and end her “immoral” relationship or she will face public humiliation.

“Bottom line, on January they 4th they are going to the church publicly with my sins, and my children will be sitting in church at the time,” Hancock told FOXNews.com.

Ok, help me here… the woman is upset that the church is going to go public with her sins, so what does she do? She calls FoxNews?

A church leader wouldn’t commit to an interview when contacted Thursday by FOXNews.com. The Rev. T. Scott Christmas, pastor of the church, told the Florida Times-Union that the “process of loving accountability” is made very clear to members, and the church is doing “nothing more than following the practices of what biblical churches have done through history.”

Christmas is a Reformed Baptist pastor of a FIRE fellowship, seemingly practicing proper church discipline.

Hancock, who is divorced, said the problems began in March, when she started telling her church mentor about her relationship — in what she thought were confidential conversations.

Confidential? She was expecting a lay-leader to lie by omission for her?

“As it progressed I told her about it and she said, ‘You’ve got to get out, you’re biblically wrong,’” Hancock said.

The mentor was right.

Despite knowing her relationship was against church rules, Hancock said she never realized that disclosing it would trigger the first in a three-step process used by the church to deal with sinners: private admonishment, admonishment in the presence of witnesses and finally public admonishment.

Yeah, nothing about that in the membership info you received when you were baptized/became a member?

“In the room, there were several women that I never told my business to. And they proceeded to tell me about my business and what I was doing and what a sinner I was — just persecuting me.” Hancock said. “One of the ladies was even saying ‘I was at your house when you didn’t come home all night.’”

It was then that Hancock said she decided to leave Grace Community Church.

“I told them, ‘I cannot believe you people are doing this. I’m not going any further — I’m never coming here again,’” she recalled.

Yes, just like marriage, if it doesn’t work, just leave!

“The pastor kept calling her, and I informed him that she [Hancock] would appreciate it if neither he nor any member of his church contacted her ever again,” Young told FOXNews.com.

Almost two months later, Hancock received the letter from the elders of Grace Community Church, explaining that she had left them no choice but to continue the disciplinary process.

“Your refusal to repent and be restored in your relationship with God and His Church leaves us with no alternative than to carry out the third step of the discipline process,” the letter explained. “In accordance with Matthew 18:17, we intend to ‘tell it to the church.’”

Sounds like what the Bible commands.

Darrell L. Bock, a research professor for the Dallas Theological Seminary, said that public admonishment is not uncommon in churches that focus on discipline but added, “Most churches would handle this much more privately than this particular community is choosing to do.”

This kind of process normally would happen after “much more private interaction” with the person, Block said, and is normally reserved for church leaders as opposed to “a normal member of the church.”

Not according to Scripture. Bock may be saying what goes on in typical evangellyfish churches, but not in Reformed/Calvinistic ones.

More importantly, he said, the actions are unusual given that Hancock had severed her relationship with the church.

Hancock sent a formal letter of resignation after receiving the elders’ ultimatum in hopes of solving the dispute. She said she fears for her 20-year-old son and 18-year-old daughter if the church carries out its threat.

She fears for them? Why? They know she was screwing around with some unbelieving kid.

“I don’t really care what they do to me. But I am concerned about my children sitting in church with their mother being crucified by the church that they trust,” she said. “I am very concerned about how it would affect them.”

But not concerned about how exposing your sins for FoxNews would affect them? Perhaps this is the kind of thinking that started the whole church discipline thing to begin with?

5 thoughts to “Florida Woman Says Former Church Plans to Make Her Sins Public”

  1. My first impulse on something like this is to say, "It’s not my church, and it’s not my business." Yes, the woman is living in adultery. No, there doesn’t seem to be any indication that she is repentant. Yes, those circumstances <B>require</B> a disciplinary response from whatever church she may be attending. <BR/><BR/>But there is no reason to believe that the phrase "tell it to the church"

  2. <I>But there is no reason to believe that the phrase "tell it to the church" in Matthew 18 means that a church must reveal details of the case, or that this revelation must take place before the entire assembly of the local congregation.</I><BR/><BR/>Nor is there any reason to think that they will, apart from her statements. What generally happens in said churches (FIRE congregations) is that

  3. <I>"The woman seems to be taking advantage of the current anti-christian climate in the US…"</I><BR/><BR/>From my perspective it looks like she is cutting off her own nose, not to spite her own face, but because she thinks someone else is about to do it and she doesn’t want to give them the pleasure. Your point is very well taken, however, in that she may not really know what her "discipline"

  4. I agree, I figure the "cultic" thing will get some traction.<BR/><BR/>I was reading through the URC hymnal’s section from their confession on church discipline and noted that their final, excommunication, statement basically says ‘You all know member X and the sins they’ve committed… you’re to have nothing to do with them until they repent.’ It was evident that there had been church-wide

Leave a Reply